
The next frontier of medical device is not in the OR. It is on your wrist, in your home, and in the cloud.
This week we cover digital health and what it means for the industry and your career.
THE EDITOR’S NOTE
A few thoughts from the field before we get into it…
When I started in this industry, the device sat on a tray in the OR and a surgeon used it to fix something. That was the model. The product was physical, the customer was in the hospital, and the interaction between device and patient happened in a controlled clinical setting with a trained professional present.
That model is not going away. But a whole new model has grown up alongside it, and it is changing the industry in ways that are still playing out. Devices that monitor patients continuously, outside the hospital, without anyone in the room. Wearables that collect clinical-grade data around the clock. Software that analyzes that data and flags problems before a patient even feels them. AI systems that help physicians make decisions in real time.
Digital health is not a trend. It is a category. And it is generating a commercial infrastructure that looks and feels different from traditional device sales in a lot of ways, but rewards the same fundamental skills: clinical credibility, relationship building, and the ability to explain complex technology to people who are busy and skeptical.
Issue #010. Ten weeks in. This week we go deep on where digital health is heading, what it means for the industry, and what it means for anyone building a career in this space.
Glad you're here. Let's get into it.
Andy Knapik, Founder
The Modern Med Rep

INDUSTRY INTEL
What's moving in med device this week and why it matters
Five Things Shaping the Industry Right Now
→ The global medical device market is now projected to reach $817 billion by 2031.
A fresh MarketsandMarkets report released this week projects the market will grow from $580 billion in 2026 to $817 billion by 2031, a compound annual growth rate of 7.1%. The fastest-growing opportunity areas named in the report: AI-enabled, connected, wearable, robotic, and minimally invasive devices. In other words, digital health is not a niche inside the device industry. It is one of the primary engines driving the whole thing.
→ Becton Dickinson recalled intraosseous needle sets linked to 45 serious injuries and four deaths.
BD recalled specific lots of its Intraosseous Vascular Access System needle sets after reports that a component could not be removed after insertion during emergency procedures including cardiac arrest. The affected lots were distributed between September 2024 and June 2026. The FDA classified it as a Class I recall, its most serious level. As we have covered in Issues #005 and #008, recalls are a routine part of this industry. This one is a reminder of what is at stake when a device fails in an emergency setting.
→ The FDA is seeking public input on a framework for generative AI-enabled medical devices.
The agency acknowledged that GenAI devices carry unique risks including hallucinations, uncertainty in intended use, and performance degradation over time. Public comments are open until October 19. For anyone in or entering the industry, this is worth watching: the FDA is essentially writing the rules for how AI-powered diagnostic and clinical decision tools will be regulated, and those rules will shape what gets built and sold for the next decade.
→ iRhythm acquired VitalConnect for $287.5 million, targeting a $1 billion cardiac monitoring market.
Following its cyberattack recovery and a strong Q2 with 20% revenue growth, iRhythm moved to expand its cardiac monitoring portfolio by acquiring VitalConnect and its VitalPatch wearable, which monitors 21 cardiac arrhythmias and several vital signs. The deal is a clear signal of where cardiac monitoring is heading: continuous, wearable, and designed to catch problems between clinical visits rather than only during them.
→ Boston Scientific is launching a major restructuring initiative amid competitive pressure.
The company is reorganizing significant parts of its commercial and operational infrastructure in response to intensifying competition across several of its core segments. Restructurings of this scale at major device companies typically displace some talent and create new roles simultaneously. Watch for hiring activity across Boston Scientific's cardiovascular, endoscopy, and neuromodulation divisions as the new structure takes shape.


MARKET SPOTLIGHT
A deep dive into the segments, companies and technologies shaping the industry
Digital Health and Connected Devices: The Fastest-Moving Frontier in Medical Device
Digital health is a broad term that covers a lot of ground. At its core, it refers to the use of technology, specifically software, connectivity, and data, to deliver, support, or improve healthcare outside the traditional clinical setting. In the medical device context, that means wearables, remote patient monitoring platforms, Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), connected implants, AI-powered diagnostic tools, and the infrastructure that ties all of it together.
Here is how the major sub-segments break down commercially.
Wearables and remote patient monitoring. This is the most visible category in digital health right now. Devices like the iRhythm Zio patch, the Abbott FreeStyle Libre continuous glucose monitor, the Dexcom G7, and the Empatica EmbraceMini collect clinical-grade physiological data continuously from patients living their normal lives. The commercial model is different from traditional device sales: instead of a one-time implant or a disposable used in a procedure, these are often subscription-based or per-patient-per-month models. The customer conversation involves physicians, hospital systems, health plans, and increasingly, employers. Clinical credibility still matters, but so does the ability to navigate software contracts, data security conversations, and reimbursement models that are still evolving.
Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). SaMD refers to software that performs a medical function on its own, without being part of a hardware device. AI-powered diagnostic imaging tools, clinical decision support platforms, and mental health apps that have received FDA clearance all fall into this category. The FDA's new GenAI framework discussion reflects just how seriously the agency is taking this segment. For commercial professionals, SaMD represents an entirely new kind of sale: the customer is often a health system CIO or clinical informatics team rather than a surgeon, the sales cycle involves IT security review and EHR integration requirements, and the value proposition is built around data, workflow efficiency, and outcomes rather than the physical properties of a product.
Connected devices and the Internet of Medical Things. Traditional medical devices are increasingly being built with connectivity built in. Pacemakers that transmit data to physicians remotely. Insulin pumps that communicate with continuous glucose monitors. Orthopedic implants with embedded sensors that track patient recovery. This convergence of traditional device hardware with digital infrastructure is creating a new category of commercial complexity, and a new category of expertise that device companies are actively recruiting for.
Digital therapeutics. A smaller but fast-developing area involves software that delivers a therapeutic intervention directly, without a physical device. FDA-cleared apps for treating conditions including insomnia, substance use disorders, and diabetes management already exist. The commercial model for digital therapeutics is still being established, but it is generating interest from both device companies looking to expand their portfolios and pharmaceutical companies looking for non-drug treatment options.
The commercial opportunity in digital health:
Digital health is generating a set of new roles that did not meaningfully exist in device five years ago: Digital Health Account Executives, Remote Monitoring Specialists, Health Informatics Sales Managers, and SaMD Commercial Directors. These roles typically combine device sales sensibilities with software sales mechanics and clinical credibility. For anyone building a device career right now, developing fluency in this space is one of the highest-leverage investments you can make.


CAREER OPPORTUNITIES
Where the jobs are, what’s paying, and how to position yourself to get there
Breaking Into Digital Health: What the Hiring Landscape Looks Like
Industry Foundation: Digital health companies sell differently from traditional device companies, and understanding that difference helps you target the right role.
Traditional device companies typically sell a product to a hospital or physician and get paid per unit or per procedure. Digital health companies often operate on a different model: subscription revenue, per-patient-per-month fees, or platform licensing agreements. The customer may be a health system, a payer, an employer, or directly a patient. The sales cycle often involves IT, compliance, and informatics teams alongside the clinical customer. This does not make digital health harder or easier than traditional device sales. It makes it different, and knowing the difference before you apply matters.
The Med Device Career Decoder covers how device business models work and how to evaluate roles based on what you are actually selling and how revenue is generated. Find it at themodernmedrep.com.
Most people watch medtech acquisitions as industry news. The people who get ahead treat them as a job market signal. Here's how to actually use M&A activity to your advantage, whether you're trying to break in or are already in the industry, looking for your next move.
Digital health is one of the most active hiring areas in the device industry right now. Here is where the opportunity is concentrated.
Remote patient monitoring. Companies like iRhythm, Dexcom, Abbott, Philips, and a growing number of startups are building commercial teams to sell and support RPM platforms. These roles typically involve hospital systems and physician practices as customers and require both clinical credibility and comfort with subscription-based commercial conversations. Clinical backgrounds in cardiology, endocrinology, and pulmonology are particularly valued.
Health system and enterprise digital health sales. Larger digital health platforms that sell to health systems and payers need enterprise account executives who can navigate complex, multi-stakeholder sales processes involving clinical, IT, and administrative decision-makers. This is one of the more senior and better-compensated roles in the digital health commercial landscape, with OTEs ranging from $150,000 to $300,000 or more at established companies.
Clinical implementation and customer success. Digital health products require significant implementation support and ongoing customer success management to drive adoption among physicians and clinical staff. These roles are excellent entry points for people with clinical backgrounds who want to move into the device industry without going straight into sales. They are also a common pathway into a full commercial role once you have built product and market knowledge.
Emerging roles worth tracking. The Marquee Staffing 2026 emerging roles report specifically flags Digital Therapeutics Specialist, Remote Monitoring Analyst, and Biomedical Device Cybersecurity Expert as roles that did not exist at meaningful scale three years ago and are now actively being recruited for. These are not the most visible roles in the job market yet, but they are where the growth is heading.
The background that travels best into digital health:
Clinical experience combined with any exposure to software, data, or technology platforms. A nurse who understands how a remote monitoring workflow fits into a physician's day is more valuable to a digital health company than a software salesperson who has never been in a clinical environment. If you have clinical credentials and are curious about technology, digital health is one of the most open doors in the industry right now.


THE MED INSIDER
One thing every med device professional should know this week
What the FDA’s GenAI Framework Means in Plain Language
The FDA is currently asking the public to weigh in on how generative AI-enabled medical devices should be regulated. The comment period is open until October 19. For most device professionals, this sounds like a regulatory policy story. It is actually a preview of what the next generation of clinical decision support tools is going to look like and what will be required to sell them.
Here is what the FDA is grappling with. Traditional AI in medical devices, like an algorithm that flags abnormal patterns in a cardiac monitor, is relatively well understood from a regulatory standpoint. It does a defined thing based on a defined input and produces a defined output. The FDA can evaluate it, clear it, and monitor its performance in the market.
Generative AI is different. A GenAI system can produce a response it has never seen before, which means its outputs are harder to predict, test, and bound in advance. The FDA specifically called out hallucinations, where the system produces output that sounds authoritative but is incorrect, as a unique risk in medical applications. A diagnostic suggestion that is wrong but presented confidently could cause a physician to miss something or pursue the wrong treatment.
What this means for the commercial landscape is that GenAI-enabled devices are going to face a more complex regulatory pathway than traditional devices, which means longer timelines and more documentation. It also means that clinical validation, transparency about model limitations, and ongoing post-market surveillance are going to be critical selling points in conversations with sophisticated hospital buyers. The rep who can explain what their company's AI does, how it was validated, and what guardrails are in place to prevent errors will have a significant advantage over one who cannot.
Worth knowing:
The FDA's willingness to specifically name hallucinations as a risk in a regulatory document is significant. It signals that the agency takes GenAI in clinical settings seriously and that companies developing these tools will be held to a high standard of transparency about their limitations. For anyone selling or planning to sell AI-enabled devices, understanding how your product addresses this concern is part of being prepared for the hospital conversation.


FROM THE FIELD
Your Questions, Answered
This week's question fits the digital health theme directly:
"I have been in traditional medical device sales for three years. Digital health seems like where things are heading. How do I make the move without starting over?"
You are not starting over. You are adding a layer. Three years of device experience, especially if it includes time in a clinical environment, is exactly the foundation that digital health companies want and cannot easily find from candidates coming purely from software or technology sales backgrounds.
The gap you need to close is on the software and business model side. Start by getting familiar with how subscription and SaaS revenue models work and how they differ from traditional device sales. Learn the basics of how remote monitoring platforms are reimbursed. Understand what EHR integration means and why hospitals care about it. None of this requires a technical background. It requires curiosity and about twenty hours of reading and listening.
The most direct path is to target companies that are bridging traditional device and digital health: iRhythm, Abbott's diabetes and diagnostics divisions, Philips, GE HealthCare's connected monitoring platforms. These companies need people who speak both languages, clinical and commercial, and are not afraid of the technology side. Your three years of device experience is a real asset there. Position it that way.
Have a question? Reply to this email. The best ones make it into the next issue.
QUOTE OF THE WEEK
“The future belongs to those who prepare for it today.”
- Malcolm X


